Skip to content
PrimeTopics offers expert commentary and analysis on curren…

Donald Trump's Regime of Consequences and Incentives

Trump's voracious desire for retribution has rapidly morphed into a methodical system. Over the twelve months, the president's fury and impulses have adopted the shape of administrative measures in ways reminiscent to historical authoritarian systems. Federal personnel who fail to comply are promptly fired and replaced by supporters. Opposing figures who confront him encounter prosecution, judicial process and penalties. Adversaries have been categorized under administration memoranda as “anti-American”, “anti-Christian” and “anti-capitalist”, and menaced with legal action as “extremists”.

The Justice System Remade

Each situation involving legal action of Trump's enemies and protection for his allies exhibits its own unique qualities. But, despite their particular nature, they exemplify expressions of what has emerged as a calculated technique. These episodes are far from random. The administration's cleansing of DoJ attorneys and Federal Bureau of Investigation officials, accompanied by his installation of devotees in senior positions, began quickly, soon assumed a consistency, and has now been molded into a system. DoJ and the law enforcement agency have been remade into political bodies under Trump's clear command to carry out his wishes. Unfairness has been rendered standard. It constitutes the system of punishment.

Administration is preoccupied with punishing the leader's supposed enemies than they are with safeguarding our national security.

Within the System

The origin of this framework has been uncovered in the court filing of multiple previous top FBI officials lodged in the ninth month in the federal court in Washington against agency head an administration figure and top lawyer a key figure for wrongful dismissal in “a initiative of revenge against the officials for what Defendants considered to be a inability to show adequate political loyalty”. The document states that Brian Driscoll, the ex- acting FBI director, describes a discussion in which he “freely admitted the illegality of his conduct”.

Driscoll had tried to defend law enforcement officers from being dismissed, the complaint states. He told him that “they” – interpreted by him to be the White House and federal prosecutors – had instructed him to fire anyone who they determined as having worked on a legal probe against him. The document adds: “He clarified that he had to dismiss the people his leaders told him to remove, because his capacity to hold his own role was contingent on the dismissal of the agents who handled matters involving the leader. He explained that there was no option he or him could do to prevent these or any other terminations, because ‘the bureau tried to put the chief in prison and he hasn't forgotten it.’” Once Driscoll told the director he was violating the FBI's own policies, he allegedly said “he knew that and he knew the essence of the immediate dismissals were probably illegal”.

Extensive Consequences

Following his claimed acknowledgment to the official, the DoJ and the law enforcement agency have been weakened and redirected for his system of punishment. Multiple of the FBI's top officials were dismissed or compelled to leave in the initial period of the presidency. Approximately 4,500 lawyers at the justice department have accepted a “deferred resignation program”. A minimum of several federal prosecutors, such as those in the New York office, stepped down in objection over what they considered as political interference in abandoning the criminal prosecution against the New York City mayor, a political figure, in return for his assistance with Trump's Immigration and Customs Enforcement roundups of migrants. The public integrity section of the department, which oversees corruption cases, has been cut down to two attorneys. The rights protection unit has been severely reduced: 70% of its personnel has resigned. 33% of senior leaders at the department have quit. The unit enforcing conservation statutes has seen departures of a majority its leadership.

Rewards and Punishments

Concerning the mayor's situation, the acting US attorney for the NY office, she, stepped down in dissent against what she described as the “exchange”. The border official, Trump's “immigration leader,” was present as the agent with the mayor on a media outlet to declare: “If he doesn't come through, I'll reappear in NYC.”. Additionally, another figure, formerly the senior DoJ official and a ex-lawyer, who brokered the arrangement, was granted an judicial position, a possible springboard to the judicial branch.

Trump's protection for offenses perpetrated while in office, granted by the extraordinary ruling of the conservative on the judicial body, thus preventing his criminal case over the Capitol riot and maintaining his public standing for the national vote, is the basis on which he depends to protect his stalwarts. Given this protection, he has been empowered to authorize corruption. The impact of the judicial ruling permeates his government and the GOP completely. Trump v United States has escalated. As Richard Nixon's White House counsel he said about the Watergate

About the author

John Bowman

A seasoned journalist with over 15 years of experience covering international politics and technology, based in Washington D.C.

PrimeTopics

Type to search articles.